It had already created a peaceful nuclear program in the years after World War II, and the nation's forced withdrawal during the Suez Canal crisis helped set the nationalistic tone needed to back weaponization.
One author connects France's decision to go nuclear with something he calls " national identity conception" - essentially, how a nation views its place in the world. Britain didn't want to rely wholly on the U.S. for protection, so the nation built the bomb as a means of self-defense. France, on the other hand, decided to build the bomb a few years later in a quest to reassert its power status.When Britain built the bomb, World War II was fresh in everyone's memory and Western Europe was on edge over fears the Soviet Union would attempt to expand further into Europe.
SEE MORE: A Group Working To Ban Global Nuclear Arms Wins Nobel Peace Prize This is different than a nuclear power like the United Kingdom.So he views the possession of ballistic missiles and nuclear capability is inextricably linked to regime survival," Gen. will try to topple its government, so it hopes nuclear weapons can prevent any action.
" I think the intel community assesses - and I agree - that Kim Jong-un is on the path he's on right now because he believes that's necessary to enhance the survival of his regime. For North Korea, it's largely about internal stability - protecting against regime change.
But going nuclear empowers governments in lots of other ways. If two nations can strike each other with a nuclear weapon and kill millions, then the chance one attacks the other decreases significantly. But these nations go nuclear for a lot of different reasons - and it rarely has to do with actually using a nuclear weapon.
The most obvious reason nations build nuclear weapons is deterrence.Other countries aren't shy about potentially acquiring their own.North Korea is the latest, and it wants more. In that time, nine countries have acquired them. Nuclear weapons have been around for more than 70 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |